THE MICHIGAN DAILY - Friday, February 23, 1996Friday FOCUS: GEO comes together over years of contract negotiations, fights
By Anupama Reddy, Daily Staff Reporter
- Twenty-one years ago this month, members of the Graduate Employees
- Organization held out for four weeks against cold weather and several
- University counterproposals before relenting and signing their first
- contract on March 14, 1975.
- Today GEO plans to announce the results of a strike authorization vote that
- members cast ballots for last week. If the majority of the organization
- agrees to strike, then GEO steering committee will strongly consider a
- walk-out.
- Marti Bombyk, a graduate student instructor in the '70s, recalled her
- experience this week as a strike captain in 1975. She said the union was
- seen as "subversive in my day, but now it's much more accepted."
- "I learned there was a need for intellectual workers to be represented by a
- union," said Bombyk, now a visiting professor in the School of Social Work.
- "The union is a great economic opportunity for graduate students and
- provides the University with the best students."
- Current University chief negotiator Dan Gamble said the history of GEO and
- the University has been "a pretty darn good relationship."
- "I get calls from around the country, other schools about their TAs starting
- to organize. They see it as negative thing, but I haven't found that here at
- the University."
- But 1975 was not the first time disgruntled "teaching fellows" refused to
- teach their classes at the University. In 1970, political science TFs called
- off classes for a week in February. They were protesting the department's
- decision to cut $18,000 in funds for teaching fellowships.
- An article in the Feb. 11, 1970 issue of The Michigan Daily said, "Prof. A.
- Organski, whose introductory course on American politics includes 22
- recitation sections, yesterday said, `From what I understand, my sections
- have not met. I don't think anybody else's did, either.'"
- Students reacted to the so-called "moratorium" in the Feb. 24 issue of the
- Daily with some concern about the long-term effects of the work stoppage.
- Bill Jacobs, a student at the time, was quoted as saying, "We don't really
- know what is going on. Class was only canceled for a week, so it didn't make
- too much difference.
- "Nevertheless, teaching fellows are supposed to teach and they defeat their
- purpose when they are not teaching."
- However, the birth of the current union did not begin with either strike.
- The teaching fellows' union began when they filed "with the (Michigan)
- Employment Relations Committee ... for recognition as the collective
- bargaining agent for all University teaching fellows," according to Daily
- articles.
- At the time, administrators estimated that 1,200 TFs were employed by the
- University. Organizing TFs claimed they had collected signatures from 30
- percent of the TF pool -- the minimum needed to file a petition for
- recognition with MERC.
- During the early years of GEO, faculty members expressed their reservations
- about the TFs' grievances.
- "I can't have any reaction at all. What's their basic purpose? Who's
- involved? We don't really know what they want," said classics department
- chair Theodore Buttrey in the Jan. 24, 1970 issue of the Daily.
- Some professors said the organizing of TFs would tighten many department
- budgets and create an economic dilemma.
- Economics department chair Harvey Brazer said in 1970, "If teaching fellow
- pay were raised, let's say from $3,000 to $5,000, it would impinge on the
- departments. It would be likely to mean larger classes and less faculty."
- MERC killed the petition and sided with the University. They decided TFs
- were not "an appropriate collective bargaining unit" and instead were part
- of a larger group including research and staff assistants.
- The summer of 1973 proved to be a hot one for teaching fellows, with several
- administrative decisions leading to a second organizing drive by the union
- -- then called the Organization of Teaching Fellows, according to GEO
- records.
- The Nov. 2, 1973 issue of the Daily reported that TFs were "calling for the
- creation of a `living wage' for TFs and a total removal of tuition for
- teaching fellows beginning in the fall of 1974."
- Former University President Robben Fleming, according to the Nov. 8, 1973
- issue of the Daily, responded by allocating $2 million of a $3.75 million
- surplus to teaching fellows "in the form of financial aid and increased
- stipends."
- OTF executive committee member Lionel Biron said at the time that OTF
- would accept the money but with caution. "They're not doing this out of
- their own good will," Biron said. "What they're really afraid of is that we're
- going to organize."
- According to GEO records, OTF members -- now referred to as "teaching
- assistants" -- joined forces with other graduate student assistants to form
- the Graduate Employees Organization, certified by MERC on April 15, 1974.
- A month-long strike began in February 1975 after eight months of mediation
- between the University and GEO failed. A state fact finder was called in to
- analyze the dispute and recommend a settlement.
- GEO spokesperson Dave Gordon said in the Jan. 22, 1975 issue of the Daily,
- "It's to (the University's) advantage to drag out the negotiations until the
- end of the academic year. By that time most of us will have completed our
- job service."
- The University agreed to give an 8-percent pay raise to all 2,200 Graduate
- Student Assistants. The union rejected the University offer, saying it was a
- "stalling" tactic.
- On the evening of Feb. 5, 1975, 1,000 GEO members resolved to take a walkout
- vote, backed by a strong endorsement of the Michigan Brotherhood of
- Teamsters.
- Union leader Mark Kaplan said, "It's time to stop waiting. It's time to show
- them (the University) that we're ready to strike until they're ready to come
- across."
- Some professors said they would not require TAs to teach if they were on
- strike.
- "I have no plans to force people to teach if they don't want to. The effect
- on us will be mostly in the primary courses, and I think it's clear that
- most of them will shut down," Psychology dDepartment Chair Keith Smith said
- in the Feb. 5, 1975 issue of the Daily.
- But not all TAs favored the strike. Martha Krieg, a romance languages TA,
- said in February 1975 that her students were more important than signing a
- contract.
- "Think of that last semester senior who wants to finish so he can get a job
- and make some money or start into summer school somewhere," Krieg said. "I
- have no right to screw somebody like that."
- She also said the University did not have as much money as GEO assumed.
- "I worked in the library for awhile and I saw the budget requests to the
- legislature, and I know the University does not have hoards of money," Krieg
- said. "There's a lot tied up by law in certain grants and funds. GEO sees
- dollars but they don't know how difficult it is to have money transferred
- into certain areas."
- In a vote, 689 out of 882 GEO members approved a strike that began at 12:01
- a.m. on Feb. 11 of that year.
- Last minute efforts to break the deadlock the previous weekend had failed.
- Fleming said he was confused about GEO's decision to strike.
- "I don't follow the logic of on one hand saying, 'Yes, we are making
- progress,' but on the other saying, 'Yes, we are going to strike.'"
- GEO chief negotiator Sandy Wilkinson assured that "a strike in no way
- suggests negotiations have broken off."
- Class attendance was cut in half the first day of the strike. Students were
- not sure which classes would still be taught, and some joined the picket
- lines.
- Then-LSA junior George Ellis said in the Feb. 12, 1975 issue of the Daily
- that GEO had a right to strike but not to bother students.
- "I'm very surprised at the way that some of the GEO members are acting,"
- Ellis said. "They have been making smart remarks and tried to keep me from
- entering the building. I support GEO's right to strike, but I have to be in
- class because I'll be held responsible for what I miss."
- After four weeks of closed negotiations, GEO agreed to a tentative agreement
- on March 12, 1975.
- Then-physics TA Mike Shane said in the Daily of the contract, "I'm not
- satisfied, but I'll settle for it."
- For the next five years, GEO began a court battle with the University over
- the classification of TAs as employees or students. In November 1981, Judge
- Schlomo Sperka of MERC ruled in the union's favor and ordered a new contract
- be negotiated.
- Bombyk was still part of GEO at the time of the court ruling and said the
- University was "obstructionist and short-sighted" during the trial.
- "When I was in the union, we were under such an attack with the court case,"
- Bombyk said in an interview Tuesday. "We didn't have such a high membership.
- Other people wondered if we were holding onto a lost cause.
- "It felt like we were in a David and Goliath cause."
- ©1996 The Michigan Daily
- Letters to the editor should be sent to
- daily.letters@umich.edu
- Comments about this site should be addressed to
- online.daily@umich.edu